home > news & blog > blog post
You’ve posted your job ad across multiple platforms, waited patiently, and yet the applications trickling in are disappointing. Either there aren’t enough of them, or the candidates simply aren’t what you’re looking for. Sound familiar?
The problem often isn’t the talent pool, it’s how you’re presenting the opportunity. Here are the most common reasons job ads fail to attract quality candidates, and what you can do about it.
The problem: “Marketing Ninja,” “Sales Rockstar,” or “Customer Happiness Hero” might feel fun internally, but candidates aren’t searching for these terms. Similarly, vague titles like “Business Manager” or “Operations Lead” could mean anything.
The fix: Use standard, searchable job titles that candidates actually look for. “Digital Marketing Manager,” “Sales Executive,” “Customer Service Advisor”, these are clear, SEO-friendly, and set proper expectations. Save the creative language for the job description itself.
The problem: Many job ads spend three paragraphs explaining the company history, mission, and values before mentioning what the role actually involves. While your company story matters, candidates care most about what they’ll be doing and whether it matches their career goals.
The fix: Start with the role. Open with a compelling summary of the position, the key responsibilities, and the impact they’ll make. Then weave in company information as context. Think: “How does this job make someone’s day better or career stronger?”
The problem: Asking for 5+ years of experience, three specific software platforms, a relevant degree, industry certifications, and “entrepreneurial spirit” for a mid-level role paying £30,000 eliminates most qualified candidates before they even apply.
The fix: Separate “must-haves” from “nice-to-haves.” Be honest about what’s genuinely essential versus what you could train. Research shows women apply when they meet 100% of criteria, while men apply at 60%—so an overly demanding list skews your applicant pool and costs you great candidates.
The problem: “Competitive salary” or “dependent on experience” frustrates candidates and wastes everyone’s time. If your budget is £35,000-£40,000 but candidates are expecting £50,000, you’ll spend weeks reviewing unsuitable applications.
The fix: Include a salary range. It filters out mismatched candidates early and builds trust. If you absolutely can’t share a number, at least provide context: “appropriate for mid-level experience in the sector” is better than nothing.
The problem: Bullet-pointed task lists reading like “manage inbox,” “attend meetings,” “create reports” tell candidates nothing about the actual impact of the role or why it might be interesting.
The fix: Instead of tasks, describe outcomes and responsibilities with context:
Help candidates visualise themselves succeeding in the role.
The problem: Many job ads list responsibilities but forget to mention what’s in it for the candidate beyond a salary. In today’s competitive market, people want to know about growth opportunities, work culture, flexibility, and benefits.
The fix: Be specific about what makes your opportunity attractive:
The problem: Corporate jargon (“synergies,” “paradigm shifts”), aggressive language (“must be able to work under extreme pressure”), or coded phrases (“looking for a culture fit”) can alienate quality candidates.
The fix: Write like you’re talking to a person, not filling out a form. Be authentic about your company voice, but keep it professional and inclusive. Avoid language that might unintentionally discourage certain demographics from applying.
The problem: Requiring candidates to create an account, complete a 30-minute assessment, answer ten essay questions, and upload five different documents before you’ve even seen their CV? Most quality candidates will abandon the process.
The fix: Make it easy to apply initially. Collect the essentials (CV, cover letter if needed) and save the detailed assessments for candidates you’re genuinely interested in. Every additional field reduces your application rate.
The problem: Posting exclusively on one job board or only on your company website severely limits your reach. Different candidates look in different places.
The fix: Diversify your approach:
Quality recruitment often means going where the candidates are, not expecting them to find you.
The problem: Job ads that end with “please apply” or provide no timeline leave candidates in limbo. When will they hear back? What’s the process?
The fix: Set clear expectations:
This transparency improves candidate experience and positions you as an organised, respectful employer.
Quality candidates have options. Your job ad is competing with dozens of others, so it needs to be clear, compelling, and candidate-focused. Think of it less as a list of demands and more as a marketing pitch for an opportunity.
If you’re consistently not attracting the right people, it’s worth revisiting not just how you write job ads, but how you’re thinking about the roles themselves. Sometimes the issue isn’t the ad, it’s clarity around what you actually need.
Writing effective job ads is both an art and a science. If you’re struggling to attract quality candidates, it might be time to get expert input on your recruitment process.
At Hatched Talent, we help businesses craft compelling job ads, target the right candidates, and streamline their hiring process. Whether you need support with a single critical hire or ongoing recruitment partnership, we’re here to help.
Get in touch at hatchedtalent.uk to discuss how we can improve your recruitment outcomes.

How to Choose the Right Recruiter for Your Business Finding the right recruitment partner can be the difference between building a strong team quickly and wasting months on poor-fit candidates. With countless agencies competing for your business, how do you identify the recruiter who’ll truly deliver? Start with Your Specific Needs Before reaching out to […]

Choosing the right recruitment model can significantly impact your hiring budget and outcomes. Let’s explore the two main approaches and help you decide which might work best for your business. Traditional Percentage-Based Recruitment Most recruitment agencies operate on a contingency basis, charging between 15-25% of the successful candidate’s first-year salary. For a £50,000 role, that’s […]